Driving automobiles

Slick-50 Motor treatment/oil

I’ve been hearing and seeing alot lately about this "Slick-50" motor treatment.
They claim that it’s not a motor oil but more of an engine protector.  
I was wondering what the various net opinions are about this product.  Has
anyone used it?  Did it help?  Could it potentially harm the engine?  I’ve
heard it’s rather expensive ($50+), is that true?

Thanks in advance,
-william

                           ||   A truely wise man does not play leapfrog     ||
William E. Burris          ||             with a unicorn                     ||
c3100…@jezebel.wustl.edu ||                           -???                 ||
                           ||  Looks like blind screaming Hedonism won out   ||

Comments (10)




10 Responses to “Slick-50 Motor treatment/oil”

  1. admin says:

    In article <1992Apr6.035058.24…@wuecl.wustl.edu> c3100…@jezebel.wustl.edu (WILLIAM) writes:

    >I’ve been hearing and seeing alot lately about this "Slick-50" motor treatment.
    >They claim that it’s not a motor oil but more of an engine protector.  
    >I was wondering what the various net opinions are about this product.  Has
    >anyone used it?  Did it help?  Could it potentially harm the engine?  I’ve
    >heard it’s rather expensive ($50+), is that true?

    >Thanks in advance,
    >-william

            Slick-50 is, as they claim, NOT oil.  It is indeed engine
    treatment, not _oil_ treatment (like STP), it’s engine treatment.
            STP and the like need to be added each time you change your
    oil, slick-50 does not.  It lasts upwards of 50,000 miles (check the
    bottle on that, it may be higher).  
            80-90% of engine wear occurs durring startup because there’s
    no oil in the engine, it’s sitting in the pan.  Ok, ok, when you start
    up after sitting for 2 minutes there is oil in the cylinders, but I’m
    talking abotu cold starts.  Slick-50 has teflon and some other stuff
    in it that coats the inside of the cylinder walls permanently.  That
    way you don’t have metal rubbing on metal anymore.  
            A friend of mine worked on a track for several years and
    Bob told me that they put slick-50 in an engine right after getting
    it.  50,000 miles later they tore it down to rebuild it and you could
    still see the original markings on the cylinder walls!  Bob has been
    working around cars all his life (he’s in his 40s) and he swears by
    the stuff.  I’ve been working with cars for about 5 years and I think
    it’s great too.  I won’t hesitate to buy a quart for the next car I
    buy.  (that was one of the first things I did when I got the one I
    have now).
            The price seems a little bit steep, but think about how long
    it’s going to last and how much money it’ll end up saving you in the
    long-run.  It used to be around $50 a bottle (1 is all you need), but
    I’ve seen it on sale recently for around $20 or so.  It is well worth
    the investment.
            Hope this helps.

    -Jason
    .

    "One day I’ll get what’s mine through the persistence of time"
                                                        -Anthrax ‘Time’

  2. admin says:

    In article <1992Apr6.035058.24…@wuecl.wustl.edu>, c3100…@jezebel.wustl.edu (WILLIAM) writes…

    >I’ve been hearing and seeing alot lately about this "Slick-50" motor treatment.
    >They claim that it’s not a motor oil but more of an engine protector.  
    >I was wondering what the various net opinions are about this product.  Has
    >anyone used it?  Did it help?  Could it potentially harm the engine?  I’ve
    >heard it’s rather expensive ($50+), is that true?

    >Thanks in advance,
    >-william

    >                           ||   A truely wise man does not play leapfrog     ||
    >William E. Burris          ||                 with a unicorn                     ||
    >c3100…@jezebel.wustl.edu ||                           -???                 ||
    >                           ||  Looks like blind screaming Hedonism won out   ||

          I saw an ad at K-mart in the paper today for slick-50
    it was only $20 for a bottle.  Not cheap but probably worth it.

  3. admin says:

    In <1992Apr6.035058.24…@wuecl.wustl.edu> c3100…@jezebel.wustl.edu (WILLIAM) writes:

    >I’ve been hearing and seeing alot lately about this "Slick-50" motor treatment.
    >They claim that it’s not a motor oil but more of an engine protector.  
    >I was wondering what the various net opinions are about this product.  Has
    >anyone used it?  Did it help?  Could it potentially harm the engine?  I’ve
    >heard it’s rather expensive ($50+), is that true?

    If you’re going to use S-50 in your car, make sure you follow the instructions
    to drive your car for about 30 minutes before turning it off. This is supposed
    to allow S-50 enough time to reach and circulate inside the engine block,
    making itself stick to the moving parts. Otherwise, if you just pour in S-50
    and park the car, your just pouring it down to the oil pan where it’s going to
    stay.

  4. admin says:

    In <10APR199215073…@rosie.uh.edu> disc…@rosie.uh.edu (92S00302) writes:

    - Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -

    >In article <1992Apr6.035058.24…@wuecl.wustl.edu>, c3100…@jezebel.wustl.edu (WILLIAM) writes…

    >>I’ve been hearing and seeing alot lately about this "Slick-50" motor treatment.
    >>They claim that it’s not a motor oil but more of an engine protector.  
    >>I was wondering what the various net opinions are about this product.  Has
    >>anyone used it?  Did it help?  Could it potentially harm the engine?  I’ve
    >>heard it’s rather expensive ($50+), is that true?

    >>Thanks in advance,
    >>-william

    >>                           ||   A truely wise man does not play leapfrog     ||
    >>William E. Burris          ||             with a unicorn                     ||
    >>c3100…@jezebel.wustl.edu ||                           -???                 ||
    >>                           ||  Looks like blind screaming Hedonism won out   ||
    >      I saw an ad at K-mart in the paper today for slick-50
    >it was only $20 for a bottle.  Not cheap but probably worth it.

    $30 up here at Canadian Tire.
    ANdy

    —….————-****—-*******-) GTI FUN-atic                      o  
    –. \/ .—–GTI—******–*********)         Don’t forget to bike:     ,-\
    –.\/\/.———–******–*********)  (and sail and windsurf and ski)  0\-0
    —….————-****—-*******-) gajew…@ug.cs.dal.ca,goa…@ac.dal.ca

  5. admin says:

    Slick 50!  Great stuff and if you’ve seen the companies PR film then you’ll
    know that you can drive a Volvo truck on a dry sump after treating the engine
    with Slick 50.
    Unfortunately you cannot say the same about my 1972 MGB GT.  Having rebuilt
    the engine approx. 3 years and some 16,000 miles ago I decided to use Slick 50
    in the engine, gearbox and with the special transmission Slick 50, in my rear
    axle.  About 3 months ago, while standing at traffic lights, the oil cooler
    decided to spray oil all over the roads.  I was only 10 kms from the nearest
    "MG emergency hospital" and 5 seconds from a Shell station.  Trusting my
    Slick 50, I purchased 5 litres of oil, filled my engine and drove to the "MG
    hospital" where a new cooler could be purchased.  Within the three months my
    oil pressure dropped from 75 psi at 2,500 rpm to 50 psi.  Damage internally
    was bad but it gave me the excuse to go for an exchange engine and upgrade
    from the standard 1800 to the big 2 litre.  Will I use Slick 50 again?  NO!
    Well not unless I decide to swop my MG for a Volvo truck – they go for miles
    on a dry sump and you can believe that cos I’ve seen the PR film!!!!!!!!!!!!

  6. admin says:

    In article <1992Apr9.215250.18…@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> jk…@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason) writes:

    - Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -

    >In article <1992Apr6.035058.24…@wuecl.wustl.edu> c3100…@jezebel.wustl.edu (WILLIAM) writes:

    >>I’ve been hearing and seeing alot lately about this "Slick-50" motor treatment
    >>They claim that it’s not a motor oil but more of an engine protector.  
    >>I was wondering what the various net opinions are about this product.  Has
    >>anyone used it?  Did it help?  Could it potentially harm the engine?  I’ve
    >>heard it’s rather expensive ($50+), is that true?

    >    Slick-50 is, as they claim, NOT oil.  It is indeed engine
    >treatment, not _oil_ treatment (like STP), it’s engine treatment.
    >    STP and the like need to be added each time you change your
    >oil, slick-50 does not.  It lasts upwards of 50,000 miles (check the
    >bottle on that, it may be higher).  
    >    80-90% of engine wear occurs durring startup because there’s
    >no oil in the engine, it’s sitting in the pan.  Ok, ok, when you start
    >up after sitting for 2 minutes there is oil in the cylinders, but I’m
    >talking abotu cold starts.  Slick-50 has teflon and some other stuff
    >in it that coats the inside of the cylinder walls permanently.  That
    >way you don’t have metal rubbing on metal anymore.  

    Yes, Slick-50 (and all the other similar products) contain Teflon ™.
    Note that nowhere on the container or in the literature is Teflon mentioned,
    however.  This is because Teflon is a registered trademark of DuPont, who
    feel that the claims made about Teflon-based oil additives are unsubstantiated
    at best.  There is NO scientific evidence that the suspended Teflon particles
    in these products actually bond or attach to the metal surfaces they claim
    to protect.  All the claims and proofs cited in promo literature are purely
    anecdotal in nature.  OTOH, the Teflon particles have been shown to attach to
    each other (albeit rarely) in a process known as "Teflon flocking" and then
    proceed to clog small oil passageways in the engine.

    DuPont, as well as the major automotive lubricant companies, have chosen to
    ignore a major, lucrative market for Teflon simply because the claims being
    made aren’t true.  All the above aside, however, this issue has risen to the
    "religious argument" status and I hold no hopes of dissuading those who’ve
    decided it’s wonderful stuff.  To each their own.


    Gary L. Rima                                            Interphase Corp.
    PP-ASEL-IA                                              (214) 919-9226
    Centurion N7358E                                        gr…@iphase.com
    N0GR                                                    CompuServe 76050,231

  7. admin says:

    In article <fragante.702945…@chilko.ucs.ubc.ca> fraga…@unixg.ubc.ca (Gv Fragante) writes:

    >If you’re going to use S-50 in your car, make sure you follow the instructions
    >to drive your car for about 30 minutes before turning it off. This is supposed
    >to allow S-50 enough time to reach and circulate inside the engine block,
    >making itself stick to the moving parts. Otherwise, if you just pour in S-50
    >and park the car, your just pouring it down to the oil pan where it’s going to
    >stay.

    Wouldn’t it circulate the next time you drove the car?  I don’t see the
    problem here.

    Chinna

    Chinnappa Ganapathy    |      People who claim they don’t let little
    ganap…@qualcomm.com  |      things bother them have never slept
    QUALCO/\/\/\/\         |      in a room with a single mosquito.

  8. admin says:

         I have a_ 1990 Eagle Talon Turbo that I race in SCCA Showroom Stock
    events.  My question does_anyone know if Slick-50 would cause any problems
    with the turbo seeing that the engine_ oil is run through it?

        Any info on S-50′s effect on turbo engine is appreciated.

    Thanks
    Sean

  9. admin says:

    In <1992Apr13.185422.20…@qualcomm.com> ganap…@tahoe.qualcomm.com (Chinnappa Ganapathy) writes:

    >Wouldn’t it circulate the next time you drove the car?  I don’t see the
    >problem here.

    Slick-50 is supposed to *coat* the moving parts of your engine with a thin
    layer of PTFE (the slippery ingredient). The instructions say that the coating
    process start when S-50 is circulated inside the engine. As the S-50 gets in
    contact with the moving parts, it forms the coat and hardens. I recall the heat
    of the engine has something to do with the hardening. I guess the coating gets
    "baked".

    Anyway, if you just pour S-50 down the oil pan without giving it a chance to
    circulate and coat the moving parts, you’re basically letting S-50 settle in
    the pan to dry and coat there instead of the engine.

  10. admin says:

    In article <1992Apr13.185422.20…@qualcomm.com> ganap…@tahoe.qualcomm.com (Chinnappa Ganapathy) writes:

    >In article <fragante.702945…@chilko.ucs.ubc.ca> fraga…@unixg.ubc.ca (Gv Fragante) writes:

    >>If you’re going to use S-50 in your car, make sure you follow the instructions
    >>to drive your car for about 30 minutes before turning it off. This is supposed
    >>to allow S-50 enough time to reach and circulate inside the engine block,
    >>making itself stick to the moving parts. Otherwise, if you just pour in S-50
    >>and park the car, your just pouring it down to the oil pan where it’s going to
    >>stay.

    >Wouldn’t it circulate the next time you drove the car?  I don’t see the
    >problem here.

            Nope.  The stuff reacts with the first metal it touches.  That
    doesn’t mean you have to get in the car instantly after the S-50 is
    added, it does take a few minutes to form a bond.  But if just add it
    and drive for a couple minutes much of the S-50 will stay in the oil
    sump, sink to the bottom and make a beautiful low friction coating on
    the inside of your pan, doing nothing to benefit your engine.  Most people
    live more than a few minutes from the place that changes their oil, so
    this usually isn’t a problem.  If you change your own oil drive around on
    some major roads for a while.  It’s best not to just drive around 25 mph
    neighborhoods for the 30 minutes.  You want the engine to circulate the
    coating everywhere the oil goes.
            BTW: My father just picked up some S-50 for $20 a quart on sale.
    I think it was at Roses or K-mart or someplace like that.  

    >Chinna
    >–
    >Chinnappa Ganapathy    |      People who claim they don’t let little
    >ganap…@qualcomm.com  |      things bother them have never slept
    >QUALCO/\/\/\/\         |      in a room with a single mosquito.

    -Jason


    "One day I’ll get what’s mine through the persistence of time"
                                                        -Anthrax ‘Time’

Place your comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.