Every stop light i’ve ever seen has a yellow plenty long for the driver to
get thru the intersection before the light turns red or else to stop.
Trouble is there are all these psychopathic drivers who see a light turn
yellow when they are still 10 car lengths from the intersection and think
they have some sort of "right" to get thru even though they could easily
stop. Then they are caught by an RLC and whine about how unfair the system
is.
Red light runners kill and maim kids every day and belong in prison.
In article <Xns98EE794CC54CCriemann1850yahoo…@207.217.125.201>,
"Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <xeton2…@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Every stop light i’ve ever seen has a yellow plenty long for the
> driver to get thru the intersection before the light turns red or
> else to stop. Trouble is there are all these psychopathic drivers who
> see a light turn yellow when they are still 10 car lengths from the
> intersection and think they have some sort of "right" to get thru
> even though they could easily stop.
Their time is very valuable and shaving seconds off their travel time is
very important–more important than you or me or the family in the
minivan who is legally proceeding through a green light.
Hopefully their dangerous driving will eliminate them from the gene pool
before they have a chance to reproduce.
Paul
–
Paul Anderson
OpenVMS Engineering
Hewlett-Packard Company
On Mar 9, 12:55 pm, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
<xeton2…@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Every stop light i’ve ever seen has a yellow plenty long for the driver to
> get thru the intersection before the light turns red or else to stop.
> Trouble is there are all these psychopathic drivers who see a light turn
> yellow when they are still 10 car lengths from the intersection and think
> they have some sort of "right" to get thru even though they could easily
> stop. Then they are caught by an RLC and whine about how unfair the system
> is.
> Red light runners kill and maim kids every day and belong in prison.
I take it you’ve never been ass-ended while stopped at a red light.
Start observing the society; it will convince you that all residents
of this God-forsaken planet, including the politicians, belong in
prison.
Because one such stoplight camera ticketed a driver in a POLICE-
ESCORTED funeral procession in nearby Greensboro, North Carolina.
Stoplight cameras can’t distinguish between drivers obeying police
officers and ordinary red light runners – as that case shows.
No $4 to park! No $6 admission! http://www.INTERNET-GUN-SHOW.com
On Mar 9, 1:55 pm, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
<xeton2…@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Every stop light i’ve ever seen has a yellow plenty long for the driver to
> get thru the intersection before the light turns red or else to stop.
I guess you can’t navigate this newsgroup a few threads down, where
this thread covers the Lubbock city’s engineer own statement about
light timing in proposing RLC…
"Earlier this month, the station cited the rule-of-thumb that Lubbock
City Engineer Jere Hart asserted as the basis for timing lights at
city intersections. At most of the proposed camera intersections, Hart
did not follow his own rule.
At 82nd and University, the 50 MPH speed limit suggests the need for a
5 second yellow, but it currently set at just 4.3 seconds. At 82nd and
Frankford, the speed of traffic requires 4.5 seconds of yellow, but
the public is only given 4.0. Milwaukee and 19th, a 55 MPH
intersection, has a 4.4 second yellow when it should be 5.5. Parkway
and Zenith has a 2.9 second yellow which is illegal under federal
regulations mandating yellow times of no less than 3.0 seconds. Hart
admitted the light should be 3.5 seconds.
Last year, before the news investigation, Hart assured city council
members that he would not increase yellow times. "
So your premise as to yellow lights always being long enough duration,
is, as usual, completely invalid to begin with.
What a surprise! :P
In article <1173471618.827453.85…@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>, edi…@netpath.net wrote:
> Because one such stoplight camera ticketed a driver in a POLICE-
> ESCORTED funeral procession in nearby Greensboro, North Carolina.
> Stoplight cameras can’t distinguish between drivers obeying police
> officers and ordinary red light runners – as that case shows.
Now that’s a way to roll in the dough… have a cop direct traffic and
let the RLC snap away.
Paul Anderson <paul.ander…@hp.com> wrote in news:paul.anderson-
35BE5C.14252709032…@usenet01.boi.hp.com:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> In article <Xns98EE794CC54CCriemann1850yahoo…@207.217.125.201>,
> "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <xeton2…@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Every stop light i’ve ever seen has a yellow plenty long for the
>> driver to get thru the intersection before the light turns red or
>> else to stop. Trouble is there are all these psychopathic drivers who
>> see a light turn yellow when they are still 10 car lengths from the
>> intersection and think they have some sort of "right" to get thru
>> even though they could easily stop.
> Their time is very valuable and shaving seconds off their travel time is
> very important–more important than you or me or the family in the
> minivan who is legally proceeding through a green light.
> Hopefully their dangerous driving will eliminate them from the gene pool
> before they have a chance to reproduce.
> Paul
Damn right. They are killers and maimers and along with speeders and drunk
drivers the worst and commonest criminals in america. But idiot americans
are told reckless driving is cool and that’s what they believe.
"MLOM" <gr…@netzero.net> wrote in
news:1173470329.213673.209750@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
> I take it you’ve never been ass-ended while stopped at a red light.
No i never have so don’t give me that crap about how you HAVE to run the
red light because the driver behind plans on running it!!! You are an
idiot and a mindless sheep.
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
"edi…@netpath.net" <edi…@netpath.net> wrote in
news:1173471618.827453.85250@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com:
> Because one such stoplight camera ticketed a driver in a POLICE-
> ESCORTED funeral procession in nearby Greensboro, North Carolina.
> Stoplight cameras can’t distinguish between drivers obeying police
> officers and ordinary red light runners – as that case shows.
Get outa here, you idiot. Even if true that don’t prove a thing. People
have been mistakenly arrested for lots of crimes Does that mean we
legalize everything?? THINK
"Sir Ray" <waterboi5…@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1173471788.778848.63470@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> On Mar 9, 1:55 pm, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
> <xeton2…@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Every stop light i’ve ever seen has a yellow plenty long for the
>> driver to get thru the intersection before the light turns red or
>> else to stop.
> I guess you can’t navigate this newsgroup a few threads down, where
> this thread covers the Lubbock city’s engineer own statement about
> light timing in proposing RLC…
> "Earlier this month, the station cited the rule-of-thumb that Lubbock
> City Engineer Jere Hart asserted as the basis for timing lights at
> city intersections. At most of the proposed camera intersections, Hart
> did not follow his own rule.
> At 82nd and University, the 50 MPH speed limit suggests the need for a
> 5 second yellow, but it currently set at just 4.3 seconds. At 82nd and
> Frankford, the speed of traffic requires 4.5 seconds of yellow, but
> the public is only given 4.0. Milwaukee and 19th, a 55 MPH
> intersection, has a 4.4 second yellow when it should be 5.5. Parkway
> and Zenith has a 2.9 second yellow which is illegal under federal
> regulations mandating yellow times of no less than 3.0 seconds. Hart
> admitted the light should be 3.5 seconds.
> Last year, before the news investigation, Hart assured city council
> members that he would not increase yellow times. "
> So your premise as to yellow lights always being long enough duration,
> is, as usual, completely invalid to begin with.
> What a surprise! :P
Yes i read that thread and that’s what prompted me to start this one.
Hell, 3 seconds is plenty of time to either stop or get thru before the
light turns red.
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> "Sir Ray" <waterboi5…@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:1173471788.778848.63470@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com:
>>On Mar 9, 1:55 pm, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
>><xeton2…@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>Every stop light i’ve ever seen has a yellow plenty long for the
>>>driver to get thru the intersection before the light turns red or
>>>else to stop.
>> I guess you can’t navigate this newsgroup a few threads down, where
>>this thread covers the Lubbock city’s engineer own statement about
>>light timing in proposing RLC…
>>"Earlier this month, the station cited the rule-of-thumb that Lubbock
>>City Engineer Jere Hart asserted as the basis for timing lights at
>>city intersections. At most of the proposed camera intersections, Hart
>>did not follow his own rule.
>>At 82nd and University, the 50 MPH speed limit suggests the need for a
>>5 second yellow, but it currently set at just 4.3 seconds. At 82nd and
>>Frankford, the speed of traffic requires 4.5 seconds of yellow, but
>>the public is only given 4.0. Milwaukee and 19th, a 55 MPH
>>intersection, has a 4.4 second yellow when it should be 5.5. Parkway
>>and Zenith has a 2.9 second yellow which is illegal under federal
>>regulations mandating yellow times of no less than 3.0 seconds. Hart
>>admitted the light should be 3.5 seconds.
>>Last year, before the news investigation, Hart assured city council
>>members that he would not increase yellow times. "
>>So your premise as to yellow lights always being long enough duration,
>>is, as usual, completely invalid to begin with.
>>What a surprise! :P
> Yes i read that thread and that’s what prompted me to start this one.
> Hell, 3 seconds is plenty of time to either stop or get thru before the
> light turns red.
At what speed?
(this is a test. Be sure to include reaction time and a reasonable
assumption for deceleration in your answer, and show your work.)
nate
–
replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel
On Mar 9, 2:58 pm, "MLOM" <g…@netzero.net> wrote:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> On Mar 9, 12:55 pm, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
> <xeton2…@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Every stop light i’ve ever seen has a yellow plenty long for the driver to
> > get thru the intersection before the light turns red or else to stop.
> > Trouble is there are all these psychopathic drivers who see a light turn
> > yellow when they are still 10 car lengths from the intersection and think
> > they have some sort of "right" to get thru even though they could easily
> > stop. Then they are caught by an RLC and whine about how unfair the system
> > is.
> > Red light runners kill and maim kids every day and belong in prison.
> I take it you’ve never been ass-ended while stopped at a red light.
> Start observing the society; it will convince you that all residents
> of this God-forsaken planet, including the politicians, belong in
> prison.
Prison = 3 squares a day.
On Mar 9, 12:23 pm, "Sir Ray" <waterboi5…@hotmail.com> wrote:
Parkway > and Zenith has a 2.9 second yellow which is illegal under
federal
> regulations mandating yellow times of no less than 3.0 seconds. Hart
> admitted the light should be 3.5 seconds.> What a surprise! :P
Are there really federal regulations mandating yellow light times? I
live in Foster City, CA where there is a green light that changes to
yellow and then red so fast it has completely cycled before I even got
to the other side of the road (I’m not kidding). I’m a young driver,
so I’m not one of those people who sit there for 30 seconds in front
of a green light before I start to hit the accelerator. When that
light hits green, I go! And about half way across the intersection it
turns yellow, and by the time I hit the other side, it turns red.
All this occurs when there is little traffic. Where I live is actually
very modern as there are underground sensors that detect whether cars
are waiting in the intersection or not. The reason I assume for the
short light times on my side is to expedite traffic on all directions.
On Mar 9, 3:45 pm, Nate Nagel <njna…@roosters.net> wrote:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
> > "Sir Ray" <waterboi5…@hotmail.com> wrote in
> >news:1173471788.778848.63470@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com:
> >>On Mar 9, 1:55 pm, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
> >><xeton2…@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>Every stop light i’ve ever seen has a yellow plenty long for the
> >>>driver to get thru the intersection before the light turns red or
> >>>else to stop.
> >> I guess you can’t navigate this newsgroup a few threads down, where
> >>this thread covers the Lubbock city’s engineer own statement about
> >>light timing in proposing RLC…
> >>"Earlier this month, the station cited the rule-of-thumb that Lubbock
> >>City Engineer Jere Hart asserted as the basis for timing lights at
> >>city intersections. At most of the proposed camera intersections, Hart
> >>did not follow his own rule.
> >>At 82nd and University, the 50 MPH speed limit suggests the need for a
> >>5 second yellow, but it currently set at just 4.3 seconds. At 82nd and
> >>Frankford, the speed of traffic requires 4.5 seconds of yellow, but
> >>the public is only given 4.0. Milwaukee and 19th, a 55 MPH
> >>intersection, has a 4.4 second yellow when it should be 5.5. Parkway
> >>and Zenith has a 2.9 second yellow which is illegal under federal
> >>regulations mandating yellow times of no less than 3.0 seconds. Hart
> >>admitted the light should be 3.5 seconds.
> >>Last year, before the news investigation, Hart assured city council
> >>members that he would not increase yellow times. "
> >>So your premise as to yellow lights always being long enough duration,
> >>is, as usual, completely invalid to begin with.
> >>What a surprise! :P
> > Yes i read that thread and that’s what prompted me to start this one.
> > Hell, 3 seconds is plenty of time to either stop or get thru before the
> > light turns red.
> At what speed?
> (this is a test. Be sure to include reaction time and a reasonable
> assumption for deceleration in your answer, and show your work.)
> nate
> —
> replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.http://members.cox.net/njnagel- Hide quoted text –
> – Show quoted text –
Want to bet on 41 in a 25?
On Mar 9, 4:39 pm, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
<xeton2…@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Sir Ray" <waterboi5…@hotmail.com> wrote innews:1173471788.778848.63470@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com:
> > On Mar 9, 1:55 pm, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
> > <xeton2…@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> Every stop light i’ve ever seen has a yellow plenty long for the
> >> driver to get thru the intersection before the light turns red or
> >> else to stop.
> > I guess you can’t navigate this newsgroup a few threads down, where
> > this thread covers the Lubbock city’s engineer own statement about
> > light timing in proposing RLC…
> > "Earlier this month, the station cited the rule-of-thumb that Lubbock
> > City Engineer Jere Hart asserted as the basis for timing lights at
> > city intersections. At most of the proposed camera intersections, Hart
> > did not follow his own rule.
> > At 82nd and University, the 50 MPH speed limit suggests the need for a
> > 5 second yellow, but it currently set at just 4.3 seconds. At 82nd and
> > Frankford, the speed of traffic requires 4.5 seconds of yellow, but
> > the public is only given 4.0. Milwaukee and 19th, a 55 MPH
> > intersection, has a 4.4 second yellow when it should be 5.5. Parkway
> > and Zenith has a 2.9 second yellow which is illegal under federal
> > regulations mandating yellow times of no less than 3.0 seconds. Hart
> > admitted the light should be 3.5 seconds.
> > Last year, before the news investigation, Hart assured city council
> > members that he would not increase yellow times. "
> > So your premise as to yellow lights always being long enough duration,
> > is, as usual, completely invalid to begin with.
> > What a surprise! :P
> Yes i read that thread and that’s what prompted me to start this one.
> Hell, 3 seconds is plenty of time to either stop or get thru before the
> light turns red
Moron, people don’t have a zero second reaction time.
The real question is what do you have against a yellow light that is 5
seconds?
On Mar 9, 3:34 pm, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
<xeton2…@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "MLOM" <g…@netzero.net> wrote innews:1173470329.213673.209750@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
> > I take it you’ve never been ass-ended while stopped at a red light.
> No i never have so don’t give me that crap about how you HAVE to run the
> red light because the driver behind plans on running it!!! You are an
> idiot and a mindless sheep.
> – Hide quoted text –
> – Show quoted text –
How about while behind OTHER stopped vehicles? I’ve had that shit
happen to me twice, because people just don’t give a rat’s ass,
including cops.
On Mar 9, 3:37 pm, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
<xeton2…@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "edi…@netpath.net" <edi…@netpath.net> wrote innews:1173471618.827453.85250@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com:
> > Because one such stoplight camera ticketed a driver in a POLICE-
> > ESCORTED funeral procession in nearby Greensboro, North Carolina.
> > Stoplight cameras can’t distinguish between drivers obeying police
> > officers and ordinary red light runners – as that case shows.
> Get outa here, you idiot. Even if true that don’t prove a thing. People
> have been mistakenly arrested for lots of crimes Does that mean we
> legalize everything?? THINK
RLCs have even been known to ticket cops. It’s not a matter of
legalizing everything but simply making the enforcement reasonable. A
cop with radar and a good set of eyes is much more reasonable than a
send-all-humans-to-prison-damn-quickly camera system.
On Mar 9, 4:39 pm, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" > Yes i
read that thread and that’s what prompted me to start this one.
> Hell, 3 seconds is plenty of time to either stop or get thru before the
> light turns red.-
This incoherent thinking shows exactly why you, SADDAM, are unfit to
offer traffic engineering advice at any level, but instead are much
more suited to become a new addition to the Body Worlds exhibits…
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
> Every stop light i’ve ever seen has a yellow plenty long for the driver to
> get thru the intersection before the light turns red or else to stop.
> Trouble is there are all these psychopathic drivers who see a light turn
> yellow when they are still 10 car lengths from the intersection and think
> they have some sort of "right" to get thru even though they could easily
> stop. Then they are caught by an RLC and whine about how unfair the system
> is.
>
There are plenty of intersections where you attempt to roll through the
green light that turns *instantly* to yellow and then red. You are
trying to time things to avoid stopping and the idiots who program the
lights think it’s funny to give you half second greens. So people are
provoked to the run the lights. It’s too bad but maybe you could
question the people who set the system up a bit more.
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> Paul Anderson <paul.ander…@hp.com> wrote in news:paul.anderson-
> 35BE5C.14252709032…@usenet01.boi.hp.com:
>> In article <Xns98EE794CC54CCriemann1850yahoo…@207.217.125.201>,
>> "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <xeton2…@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Every stop light i’ve ever seen has a yellow plenty long for the
>>> driver to get thru the intersection before the light turns red or
>>> else to stop. Trouble is there are all these psychopathic drivers who
>>> see a light turn yellow when they are still 10 car lengths from the
>>> intersection and think they have some sort of "right" to get thru
>>> even though they could easily stop.
>> Their time is very valuable and shaving seconds off their travel time is
>> very important–more important than you or me or the family in the
>> minivan who is legally proceeding through a green light.
>> Hopefully their dangerous driving will eliminate them from the gene pool
>> before they have a chance to reproduce.
>> Paul
> Damn right. They are killers and maimers and along with speeders and drunk
> drivers the worst and commonest criminals in america. But idiot americans
> are told reckless driving is cool and that’s what they believe.
>
The simple solution would be not to force drivers to stop at every
light. Simply time the lights so that drivers don’t have to always stop.
How hard is that? But they refuse to do that properly.
Bill Bonde <tributyltinpa…@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in
news:est24m$j6h$5@news.datemas.de:
> The simple solution would be not to force drivers to stop at every
> light. Simply time the lights so that drivers don’t have to always
> stop. How hard is that? But they refuse to do that properly.
Oh shut up, you idiot!!! So what if you have to stop for a stoplight?. You
make it sound like the EOTW. You are a nutball.
Bill Bonde <tributyltinpa…@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in
news:est20o$j6h$4@news.datemas.de:
> There are plenty of intersections where you attempt to roll through
> the green light that turns *instantly* to yellow and then red.
There are no such stoplights. You are a bald-faced liar and a flaming
nutball.
"Larry Bud" <larrybud2…@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:1173478690.625721.3290@8g2000cwh.googlegroups.com:
> On Mar 9, 4:39 pm, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
> <xeton2…@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Yes i read that thread and that’s what prompted me to start this one.
>> Hell, 3 seconds is plenty of time to either stop or get thru before
>> the light turns red
> Moron, people don’t have a zero second reaction time.
They do if they’re paying attention. Trouble is nuts like you driving thru
busy downtowns while yakking on a cellphone. Then a light turns yellow and
you don’t see it till 3 seconds later and then a second later it changes to
red and then you’re screaming about the stupid stoplights!!! URAMORON
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
> Bill Bonde <tributyltinpa…@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in
> news:est20o$j6h$4@news.datemas.de:
>> There are plenty of intersections where you attempt to roll through
>> the green light that turns *instantly* to yellow and then red.
> There are no such stoplights. You are a bald-faced liar and a flaming
> nutball.
You’ve been through every intersection in the country from every
direction? That’s the only way you could accurately make that statement.
–
My parents thought I was a real wit, and they were half right.
–source unknown
> I’m all for this as distracted drivers are killers and maimers. This is
> one more reason why window tinting should be banned so cops can more
> easily catch these creatures before they run over a kid.
What about your piece of shit that has crappy tires? What happens
when you run over a kid?
"Larry Bud" <larrybud2…@yahoo.com> wrote in news:1173472491.596865.158870
@q40g2000cwq.googlegroups.com:
>> I’m all for this as distracted drivers are killers and maimers. This is
>> one more reason why window tinting should be banned so cops can more
>> easily catch these creatures before they run over a kid.
> What about your piece of shit that has crappy tires? What happens
> when you run over a kid?
My tires are fine. Only got about 10K on them. Cheapies, but they work.
And BTW this thread is about drivers who eat, not bald tires, you moron.
On Mar 9, 4:41 pm, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
<xeton2…@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Larry Bud" <larrybud2…@yahoo.com> wrote in news:1173472491.596865.158870
> @q40g2000cwq.googlegroups.com:
> >> I’m all for this as distracted drivers are killers and maimers. This is
> >> one more reason why window tinting should be banned so cops can more
> >> easily catch these creatures before they run over a kid.
> > What about your piece of shit that has crappy tires? What happens
> > when you run over a kid?
> My tires are fine. Only got about 10K on them. Cheapies, but they work.
> And BTW this thread is about drivers who eat, not bald tires, you moron.
Then why are you talking about tinted windows?
It’s about safety. Who said anything about bald tires? You (re)
admitting to something?
On Mar 9, 7:58 am, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
<xeton2…@yahoo.com> wrote:
> A salesman has become the first driver to have points put on his licence> for eating a sandwich at the wheel.
Looks like I won’t be driving in the UK anytime soon. I don’t always
drive while eating with sandwich in hand but I will if I don’t have
any time for lunch! =D
"Larry Bud" <larrybud2…@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1173472491.596865.158870@q40g2000cwq.googlegroups.com…
>> I’m all for this as distracted drivers are killers and maimers. This is
>> one more reason why window tinting should be banned so cops can more
>> easily catch these creatures before they run over a kid.
> What about your piece of shit that has crappy tires? What happens
> when you run over a kid?
The tread marks aren’t as deep?
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
"Larry Bud" <larrybud2…@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:1173478179.748346.299200@t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> On Mar 9, 4:41 pm, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
> <xeton2…@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> "Larry Bud" <larrybud2…@yahoo.com> wrote in
>> news:1173472491.596865.158870 @q40g2000cwq.googlegroups.com:
>> >> I’m all for this as distracted drivers are killers and maimers.
>> >> This is one more reason why window tinting should be banned so
>> >> cops can more easily catch these creatures before they run over a
>> >> kid.
>> > What about your piece of shit that has crappy tires? What happens
>> > when you run over a kid?
>> My tires are fine. Only got about 10K on them. Cheapies, but they
>> work.
>> And BTW this thread is about drivers who eat, not bald tires, you
>> moron.
> Then why are you talking about tinted windows?
Can’t you figure out anything? Cops can’t see what the driver is doing if
the windows are tinted. THINK
mahadra…@gmail.com wrote in
news:1173478664.069096.28990@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com:
> On Mar 9, 7:58 am, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
> <xeton2…@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> A salesman has become the first driver to have points put on his
>> licence> for eating a sandwich at the wheel.
> Looks like I won’t be driving in the UK anytime soon. I don’t always
> drive while eating with sandwich in hand but I will if I don’t have
> any time for lunch! =D
Well then, you’re a psychopath. How many kids have you murdered by your
distracted driving??
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?
> in_article_id=441082&in_page_id=1770&in_a_source=
> http://tinyurl.com/37hcb6
> Driver fined for eating his sandwich
<snip>
> Introduced at the end of last month, the ban covers all drivers who are
> not fully in control of their vehicle.
> Mr Pemberton, 29, spoke of his shock yesterday, claiming he had no idea
> the mobile ban also covered his cheese and pickle sandwich.
> ‘In my mind, I was completely in control of the car,’ he said.
> ‘You see people putting on makeup and all sorts of things at the wheel.
Logically, if eating a sandwich is prohibited than so also should be smoking a
cigarette or taking a sip of a drink. Fiddling with the car audio must surely
come close too.
I strongly dislike legislation being hijacked for purposes that weren’t the
original intent.
Graham
Ladies and Gentlemen (and I use those words loosely), Larry Bud said in
rec.autos.driving:
<< reply limited to r.a.d >>
> > I’m all for this as distracted drivers are killers and maimers. This is
> > one more reason why window tinting should be banned so cops can more
> > easily catch these creatures before they run over a kid.
> What about your piece of shit that has crappy tires? What happens
> when you run over a kid?
Two words: lynch mob…..
–
"My tars have been bald for two years.
Every month i glue some sandpaper to them and
everythings cool."
–Laura Buch murdered her boyfriend
/ laura bush – VEHICULAR HOMICIDE 10/25/05
Message ID: s2ttl1tgnpq5pr6p48lr111p3lnvr4b…@4ax.com
http://tinyurl.com/7p7xq
Ladies and Gentlemen (and I use those words loosely), Guy said in
rec.autos.driving:
> "Larry Bud" <larrybud2…@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1173472491.596865.158870@q40g2000cwq.googlegroups.com…
> >> I’m all for this as distracted drivers are killers and maimers. This is
> >> one more reason why window tinting should be banned so cops can more
> >> easily catch these creatures before they run over a kid.
> > What about your piece of shit that has crappy tires? What happens
> > when you run over a kid?
> The tread marks aren’t as deep?
Sand paper rash?
–
"My tars have been bald for two years.
Every month i glue some sandpaper to them and
everythings cool."
–Laura Buch murdered her boyfriend
/ laura bush – VEHICULAR HOMICIDE / Speeders and
Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS, 10/25/05
Message ID: s2ttl1tgnpq5pr6p48lr111p3lnvr4b…@4ax.com
http://tinyurl.com/7p7xq
Ladies and Gentlemen (and I use those words loosely), Speeders & Drunk
Drivers are MURDERERS, a connoisseur of gay kid porn and the bodily
fluids of goats, spewed forth this crapola all over the landscape in
rec.autos.driving:
> "Larry Bud" <larrybud2…@yahoo.com> wrote in news:1173472491.596865.158870
> @q40g2000cwq.googlegroups.com:
> >> I’m all for this as distracted drivers are killers and maimers. This is
> >> one more reason why window tinting should be banned so cops can more
> >> easily catch these creatures before they run over a kid.
> > What about your piece of shit that has crappy tires? What happens
> > when you run over a kid?
> My tires are fine. Only got about 10K on them. Cheapies, but they work.
Then explain your comments in the .sig.
> And BTW this thread is about drivers who eat, not bald tires, you moron.
This thread is about whatever we in the r.a.d cabal (tinc) say it is
about. And BTW, *you* are *not* a member of the cabal (tinc).
–
"My tars have been bald for two years.
Every month i glue some sandpaper to them and
everythings cool."
–Laura Buch murdered her boyfriend
/ laura bush – VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
/ Speeders & Drunk Drivers Are MURDERERS
10/25/05
Message ID: s2ttl1tgnpq5pr6p48lr111p3lnvr4b…@4ax.com
http://tinyurl.com/7p7xq
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati…@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:45F22874.EE9573EE@hotmail.com:
> Logically, if eating a sandwich is prohibited than so also should be
> smoking a cigarette or taking a sip of a drink. Fiddling with the car
> audio must surely come close too.
Yes indeed. Drinking and smoking should also be banned. And letting people
have radios and CDs in their car is total insanity. Drivers have been
brainswashed into thinking that driving should be fun and to hell with
safety.