I have wondered about acceleration and the law. Could I possibly be
breaking some inane law by accelerating up to, but not exceeding, the
posted speed limit very rapidly? For example, using the full 0 to 45
potential of my car?
I wonder about this more often now that I have 0-60 times in the 3
second range. But even in slower modes of transport with 7 sec. times,
I have wondered what a "protector of humanity" would do. In my
younger and more foolish days, I smoked a cop away from a red light
all the way up to the posted limit. Ooooooooooo.
Section 23.67-8 paragraph 17b: Accelerating faster than the federally
mandated second derivative of location
equation deems suitable for the well
being and safety of the helpless
citixens of this, the United States of
America.
???????
—
————————————————————>DarkMan——–>
Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio DoD #650
Anyone know where a mechanical engineer can get a job?
In article @rpi.edu, joh…@aix.rpi.edu (Hugh Johnson) writes:
|>In article <1992Aug17.164537.25…@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> j…@po.CWRU.Edu (John R. Daker) writes:
|>>
|>>I have wondered about acceleration and the law. Could I possibly be
|>>breaking some inane law by accelerating up to, but not exceeding, the
|>>posted speed limit very rapidly? For example, using the full 0 to 45
|>>potential of my car?
|>
|>I know someone who was dumb enough to try this in front of a cop to find out.
|>(The moron was in a screaming red ’91 Corvette) He was first in line at a stop-
|>light, and there was a patrol car behind him. He dropped his clutch and blew
|>on up to 45, the posted speed limit, where he stopped accelerating. The cop
|>pulled him over almost immediately. My friend tried to argue that he wasn’t
|>speeding and didn’t break any laws, but the cop disagreed and gave him a ticket
|>for reckless driving. My friend went to traffic court to further argue his
|>point, but the judge decreed that smoking tires and "excessive" acceleration
|>were grounds for a reckless driving charge. This was in a rural-suburban type
|>area, so I don’t know how much urban cops would care about this.
There are also areas that have specific laws against drag racing
on public streets. WHen I was in drivers ed in Ohio, that said that
"pealing out" was considered to be prima facie evidence of drag
racing even if no other cars were involved.
Reckless driving or driving without due regard tickets are somewhat
a matter of discretion on the part of the police officer. If you are
doing something stupid, you might get one. Making the charge stick in
court is a different matter.
In any case, the answers to this question may (probably) vary from
one location to another. The best way to get an answer is to call
your state and local police and ask them.
—
Robert Haar InterNet : rh…@gmr.com
Computer Science Dept., G.M. Research Laboratories
DISCLAIMER: Unless indicated otherwise, everything in this note is
personal opinion, not an official statement of General Motors Corp.
In article @rpi.edu, joh…@aix.rpi.edu (Hugh Johnson) writes:
>I have wondered about acceleration and the law. Could I possibly be
>breaking some inane law by accelerating up to, but not exceeding, the
>posted speed limit very rapidly? For example, using the full 0 to 45
>potential of my car?
In NH these actions are prosecuted by two different laws. The obvious
one is reckless driving, which would certainly apply to full
accelleration at an intersection for no reason — if something
appeared in your path (a likely thing at an intersection) you’d have a
hard time avoiding it. The other law is misuse of power, which is
usually used to prosecute people for burning out.
I always thought they ought to prosecute tire-burners for air
.
pollution, but whatever works
jim frost
j…@centerline.com
In article <1992Aug17.164537.25…@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> j…@po.CWRU.Edu (John R. Daker) writes:
>I have wondered about acceleration and the law. Could I possibly be
>breaking some inane law by accelerating up to, but not exceeding, the
>posted speed limit very rapidly? For example, using the full 0 to 45
>potential of my car?
A friend of mine was pulled over and questioned for 20 minutes for peeling out
(in a very small way) from a traffic light. After checking the driver’s licences
of *everyone in the car*, the cop made some snide comment about "drag racing"
and let my friend go. My friend never even got close to the speed limit, and
certainly wasn’t drag racing. In pulling my friend over, the cop ignored
several cars travelling faster than the speed limit.
I don’t know if this is the type of thing you were asking about, but I figured
gar…@rpi.edu
I’d mention it.
—
Matt Garretson
In article <88…@rphroy.ph.gmr.com> rh…@albert.cs.gmr.com writes:
>In article @rpi.edu, joh…@aix.rpi.edu (Hugh Johnson) writes:
>|>In article <1992Aug17.164537.25…@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> j…@po.CWRU.Edu (John R. Daker) writes:
>|>>
>|>>I have wondered about acceleration and the law. Could I possibly be
[Lots of stuff deleted]
In Texas it is called "Exhibition of Acceleration" and they will give you a
ticket. I am not sure what the exact definition is, but spinning your tires
is included.
—
Stephen Johns, Research Analyst
Southwest Research Institute, SA, TX 78228 (512) 522-5751
>I have wondered about acceleration and the law. Could I possibly be
>breaking some inane law by accelerating up to, but not exceeding, the
>posted speed limit very rapidly?
There is usually such a law, left up to the nonquantitative
discretion of the nice officer. The offense is generally called
something like "Exhibition of Speed." It is used to take teenage
immortals down a peg or two when they seem confused about the
difference between Main Street and a drag strip, but the particular
incident doesn’t seem to merit the more serious charges of "racing"
or "reckless driving." In other words, a minor ticket whose wording
causes one’s parents to have a major cow.
>I wonder about this more often now that I have 0-60 times in the 3
>second range.
How did you get the catapult officer to start using nitrous oxide?
–Joe
"Just another personal opinion from the People’s Republic of Berkeley"
While reading article <1…@io.trident.datasys.swri.edu>, I noticed that
jo…@trident.datasys.swri.edu (Stephen Johns) said the following:
>In Texas it is called "Exhibition of Acceleration" and they will give you a
>ticket. I am not sure what the exact definition is, but spinning your tires
>is included.
Remember also that the "exhibition of acceleration" ticket is subjective at
best. For example, squealing tires followed by acceleration to 40 MPH in the
following 1-3 seconds is probably exhibition of speed, as opposed to having
your foot slip off the clutch, producing an embarrassing drag-strip like squeal.
For that matter, applying full throttle to a 5.0 Mustang in 1st – 3rd gears
tends to break the tires loose regardless of your intent.
—
| William Kucharski, Solbourne Computer, Inc. | Opinions expressed above
| Internet: kucha…@solbourne.com Ham: N0OKQ | are MINE alone, not those
| Snail Mail: 1900 Pike Road, Longmont, CO 80501 | of Solbourne Computer, Inc.
| President, "Just the Ten of Us" Fan Club | "Dittos from Longmont, CO"
In article <1992Aug17.164537.25…@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> j…@po.CWRU.Edu (John R. Daker) writes:
>I have wondered about acceleration and the law. Could I possibly be
>breaking some inane law by accelerating up to, but not exceeding, the
>posted speed limit very rapidly? For example, using the full 0 to 45
>potential of my car?
I don’t know about other states, but unless you spin your wheels, you
can accelerate as fast as you want in MD. Unfortunately, it gets cops
attention– even in a wimpy car– since most people seem to think you
ought to ease back up to the limit, you break from the pack.
—
Matthew T. Russotto russo…@eng.umd.edu russo…@wam.umd.edu
Some news readers expect "Disclaimer:" here.
Just say NO to police searches and seizures. Make them use force.
(not responsible for bodily harm resulting from following above advice)
In a previous article, russo…@eng.umd.edu (Matthew T. Russotto) says:
>In article <1992Aug17.164537.25…@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> j…@po.CWRU.Edu (John R. Daker) writes:
>>I have wondered about acceleration and the law. Could I possibly be
>>breaking some inane law by accelerating up to, but not exceeding, the
>>posted speed limit very rapidly? For example, using the full 0 to 45
>>potential of my car?
>I don’t know about other states, but unless you spin your wheels, you
>can accelerate as fast as you want in MD. Unfortunately, it gets cops
>attention– even in a wimpy car– since most people seem to think you
>ought to ease back up to the limit, you break from the pack.
This is what I should have said. No tire squeal, just good, strong
acceleration. Pulling away from the pack of rusted out Chevys and
wimpy driven 535i’s.
—
————————————————————>DarkMan——–>
Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio DoD #650
Anyone know where a mechanical engineer can get a job?
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
In article <jimf.714081…@centerline.com>, j…@centerline.com (Jim Frost) writes:
> In article @rpi.edu, joh…@aix.rpi.edu (Hugh Johnson) writes:
>>I have wondered about acceleration and the law. Could I possibly be
>>breaking some inane law by accelerating up to, but not exceeding, the
>>posted speed limit very rapidly? For example, using the full 0 to 45
>>potential of my car?
> In NH these actions are prosecuted by two different laws. The obvious
> one is reckless driving, which would certainly apply to full
> accelleration at an intersection for no reason — if something
> appeared in your path (a likely thing at an intersection) you’d have a
> hard time avoiding it. The other law is misuse of power, which is
> usually used to prosecute people for burning out.
> I always thought they ought to prosecute tire-burners for air
.
> pollution, but whatever works
> jim frost
> j…@centerline.com
Can’t cite the code sections, but in California, you can accelerate as fast as
you want to the limit provided your tires don’t squeel. If you smoke ‘em up,
then it is exhibition of speed (racing…) or reckless driving depending upon
the opinion of the arresting officer.
Interesting side note on full throttle acceleration: the drivers manual for the
with a lot of noice when the turbo cuts in.
911 Turbo (1989, not sure of others) requires that you accelerate at full
throttle in first gear to 5000RPM once the car is warm EVERY TIME YOU DRIVE IT.
The reason: to clean out the wastegate. Now, 5000RPM is 35MPH, but you get
there in about 1 second
Ed Oates (my opinions, not Oracle’s)
In article <1992Aug17.164537.25…@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> j…@po.CWRU.Edu (John R. Daker) writes:
>I have wondered about acceleration and the law. Could I possibly be
>breaking some inane law by accelerating up to, but not exceeding, the
>posted speed limit very rapidly? For example, using the full 0 to 45
>potential of my car?
An officer might write you up for excessive *display* of speed, even if
you do not exceed the speed limit. Whether or not it would stand up in
court is another story. I suspect that the point of the ticket would
be more as a wake-up call than as a civil charge.
____________________________________________________________________________
Daniel A. Harling (harl…@pictel.com)
PictureTel Corp. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of
Peabody, MA 01960 PictureTel, but they ought to be!
> I have wondered about acceleration and the law. Could I possibly be
> breaking some inane law by accelerating up to, but not exceeding, the
> posted speed limit very rapidly? For example, using the full 0 to 45
> potential of my car?
"making an improper start"
From the Framingham, MA police blotter:
Fri 8/7/92 10:14 pm: JD, 22, of 40 PH Road was arrested after JD struck Officer
Smith on PH Road with his truck and kept on going. Smith, who was on foot
detail, had signaled the truck to stop with his flashlight after JD allegedly
pulled out of a parking spot squealing his tires. JD stopped the truck, put it
in reverse and hit Smith in the side. He was stopped nearby by a cruiser and
was charged with assault and battery with a dangerous weapon (motor vehicle),
failure to stop for a police officer, operating to endanger, speeding,
operating without headlights and making an improper start.
–
# Monty Solomon / PO Box 2486 / Framingham, MA 01701-0405
# monty%ros…@think.com
In article <1992Aug18.14200…@us.oracle.com> eoa…@us.oracle.com writes:
>Can’t cite the code sections, but in California, you can accelerate as fast as
>you want to the limit provided your tires don’t squeel. If you smoke ‘em up,
>then it is exhibition of speed (racing…) or reckless driving depending upon
>the opinion of the arresting officer.
what if you’re deaf and can’t hear the tires squeal?
>Interesting side note on full throttle acceleration: the drivers manual
with a lot of noice when the turbo cuts in.
>for the
>911 Turbo (1989, not sure of others) requires that you accelerate at full
>throttle in first gear to 5000RPM once the car is warm EVERY TIME YOU
>DRIVE IT.
>The reason: to clean out the wastegate. Now, 5000RPM is 35MPH, but you get
>there in about 1 second
0-35 mph in one second? in your dreams. try two.
if you were talking about a bennetton F1 race car, i might believe you.
btw, i like this owner’s manual.
-teddy
In article <lkdy…@rpi.edu> gar…@aix.rpi.edu (Matthew Olsen Garretson) writes:
>In article <1992Aug17.164537.25…@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> j…@po.CWRU.Edu (John R. Daker) writes:
>>I have wondered about acceleration and the law. Could I possibly be
>>breaking some inane law by accelerating up to, but not exceeding, the
>>posted speed limit very rapidly? For example, using the full 0 to 45
>>potential of my car?
>A friend of mine was pulled over and questioned for 20 minutes for peeling out
>(in a very small way) from a traffic light.
I was on my bike one day and left a cop at a light. Zero to 45mph speed
limit in 0.001 seconds… At the next light, he came back along side of
me and I got a nasty "don’tdothatagain" look. 8^)
–
j…@access.digex.com | (Cage) 1991 323se ZCP-710 | Comus Road
Merry Land (MD) U.S.A. | (Bike) 1986 GSXR750 (sold) | ClarksBURG
——————————————————————————
But of course, I have three eyes. I have clairvoyant paranoia. -King Missile
John R. Daker (j…@po.CWRU.Edu) wrote:
: I have wondered what a "protector of humanity" would do. In my
: younger and more foolish days, I smoked a cop away from a red light
: all the way up to the posted limit. Ooooooooooo.
Reminds me of the time when I was driving home from a night out — it
was 2am in the morning, clear sky, moon out, deserted roads. Anyway, I
was sitting at a set of lights on a three-lane highway when a guy in
an ’89 Honda Prelude pulled up beside me. He was revving his engine,
and so I thought, "Right! Let’s take this guy!". So when the lights
turned green, I smoked him away from the lights (I drive a mildly
worked ’79 Mazda 626). So, for the next 3 lights, we had full-on
accleration runs. No other cars on the road, and photo radar wasn’t
around then, so I didn’t really care too much. Anyways, we were pretty
even — it came down to who was first away from the lights.
At the final set of lights, he made the "time-out" sign (you know, hands
together to form a "T") and I nodded. Then he pulled out his wallet
and flashed his cop’s shield. Oops. Should have seen the smirk on
his face! No ticket, though, thank the lord.
D.P.
—
|================================|===================================|
Deeran Peethamparam | "Just remember — good
ins4…@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au | attitudes are free…"
dp…@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au | S.J. 1989
|================================|===================================|
j…@centerline.com (Jim Frost) writes:
>In NH these actions are prosecuted by two different laws. The obvious
>one is reckless driving, which would certainly apply to full
>accelleration at an intersection for no reason — if something
>appeared in your path (a likely thing at an intersection) you’d have a
>hard time avoiding it. The other law is misuse of power, which is
>usually used to prosecute people for burning out.
"Misuse of power?" Hmm… Ya think maybe George Bush and a few other politicos
have gotten a few of those tickets?
–
Scott Coleman t…@uiuc.edu
Free Advice: It is inadvisable to read Bush’s lips at an official banquet.
In article <1992Aug19.234527.18…@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> ins4…@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au (Deeran Peethamparam) writes:
>Reminds me of the time when I was driving home from a night out — it
>was 2am in the morning, clear sky, moon out, deserted roads. Anyway, I
>was sitting at a set of lights on a three-lane highway when a guy in
>an ’89 Honda Prelude pulled up beside me. He was revving his engine,
>and so I thought, "Right! Let’s take this guy!".
[Incidents of drag racing omitted.]
>At the final set of lights, he made the "time-out" sign (you know, hands
>together to form a "T") and I nodded. Then he pulled out his wallet
>and flashed his cop’s shield. Oops. Should have seen the smirk on
>his face! No ticket, though, thank the lord.
Yeah, it would have been fun to take the sucker to court on an
entrapment charge.
In article <1992Aug19.202640.26…@leland.Stanford.EDU>, tedeb…@leland.Stanford.EDU (Theodore Chen) writes:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> In article <1992Aug18.14200…@us.oracle.com> eoa…@us.oracle.com writes:
>>Can’t cite the code sections, but in California, you can accelerate as fast as
>>you want to the limit provided your tires don’t squeel. If you smoke ‘em up,
>>then it is exhibition of speed (racing…) or reckless driving depending upon
>>the opinion of the arresting officer.
> what if you’re deaf and can’t hear the tires squeal?
>>Interesting side note on full throttle acceleration: the drivers manual
with a lot of noice when the turbo cuts in.
>>for the
>>911 Turbo (1989, not sure of others) requires that you accelerate at full
>>throttle in first gear to 5000RPM once the car is warm EVERY TIME YOU
>>DRIVE IT.
>>The reason: to clean out the wastegate. Now, 5000RPM is 35MPH, but you get
>>there in about 1 second
> 0-35 mph in one second? in your dreams. try two.
> if you were talking about a bennetton F1 race car, i might believe you.
> btw, i like this owner’s manual.
> -teddy
Didn’t you notice the smiley? Yeah, it won’t go 0 – 35 in one second, but I’m
so happy while I’m flooring it and the backing off (or shifting…) at around
35, that I lose count
Ed Oates (my opinions, not Oracle’s)
In article <1992Aug19.234527.18…@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> ins4…@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au (Deeran Peethamparam) writes:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
>John R. Daker (j…@po.CWRU.Edu) wrote:
>: I have wondered what a "protector of humanity" would do. In my
>: younger and more foolish days, I smoked a cop away from a red light
>: all the way up to the posted limit. Ooooooooooo.
>Reminds me of the time when I was driving home from a night out — it
>was 2am in the morning, clear sky, moon out, deserted roads. Anyway, I
>was sitting at a set of lights on a three-lane highway when a guy in
>an ’89 Honda Prelude pulled up beside me. He was revving his engine,
>and so I thought, "Right! Let’s take this guy!". So when the lights
>turned green, I smoked him away from the lights (I drive a mildly
>worked ’79 Mazda 626). So, for the next 3 lights, we had full-on
>accleration runs. No other cars on the road, and photo radar wasn’t
>around then, so I didn’t really care too much. Anyways, we were pretty
>even — it came down to who was first away from the lights.
>At the final set of lights, he made the "time-out" sign (you know, hands
>together to form a "T") and I nodded. Then he pulled out his wallet
>and flashed his cop’s shield. Oops. Should have seen the smirk on
>his face! No ticket, though, thank the lord.
>D.P.
>–
In New York they call that a "Contest of Speed" not sure what the fine is
though.
In article <1992Aug25.055015.14…@leland.Stanford.EDU> tedeb…@leland.Stanford.EDU (Theodore Chen) writes:
>In article <1992Aug24.171230.18…@ctp.com> bp…@ctp.com (Bob Pitas) writes:
>>In article <1992Aug17.164537.25…@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> j…@po.CWRU.Edu (John R. Daker) writes:
>>>I wonder about this more often now that I have 0-60 times in the 3
>>>second range.
>>Commuting in a top-fuel dragster? What the hell car gets ’3 second range’
>>0-60 times? Even if you drive around with slicks, I find it hard to believe
>>that you can get under 4 seconds… (I don’t think most motorcycles can
>>hole-shot that fast!)
Dude my 600 CBR does 0-60 in 3 seconds… what planet do you live on???
In article <1992Aug25.055015.14…@leland.Stanford.EDU> tedeb…@leland.Stanford.EDU (Theodore Chen) writes:
>In article <1992Aug24.171230.18…@ctp.com> bp…@ctp.com (Bob Pitas) writes:
|>Commuting in a top-fuel dragster? What the hell car gets ’3 second range’
|>0-60 times? Even if you drive around with slicks, I find it hard to believe
|>that you can get under 4 seconds… (I don’t think most motorcycles can
|>hole-shot that fast!)
|there are a few motorcycles (in the one-liter class) that will
|go under 3 seconds for the 0-60 with ETs in the 10 second range.
|and a honda CBR600F2 takes just a hair over 3 seconds for the 0-60.
No doubt he was referring to American motorcycles
—
Chris Malcolm c…@uk.ac.ed.aifh +44 (0)31 650 3085
Department of Artificial Intelligence, Edinburgh University
5 Forrest Hill, Edinburgh, EH1 2QL, UK DoD #205
>In article <1992Aug25.055015.14…@leland.Stanford.EDU>
>tedeb…@leland.Stanford.EDU (Theodore Chen) writes:
>>In article <1992Aug24.171230.18…@ctp.com> bp…@ctp.com (Bob Pitas)writes:
>>>In article <1992Aug17.164537.25…@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> j…@po.CWRU.Edu
>>>(John R. Daker) writes:
>>>>I wonder about this more often now that I have 0-60 times in the 3
>>>>second range.
>>>Commuting in a top-fuel dragster? What the hell car gets ’3 second range’
>>>0-60 times? Even if you drive around with slicks, I find it hard tobelieve
>>>that you can get under 4 seconds… (I don’t think most motorcycles can
>>>hole-shot that fast!)
> Dude my 600 CBR does 0-60 in 3 seconds… what planet do you live on???
Turbine Corvette (built by Andy Granatelli, 100% street legal):
0-60, 3.6 secs.
Admittedly not quite stock. Saw it in an old Motor Trend.
–Andy
—————————————————-
"I didn’t do it to make history. You do something
that you want to do or feel you have to do, because
you like it and love it. And if it turns out to be
history, well, so what?"
–Carroll Shelby,
from "The Cobra-Ferrari Wars"
—————————————————-
In article <94…@bu.edu> anton…@buitc.bu.edu (George Antoniou) writes:
>In article <1992Aug25.055015.14…@leland.Stanford.EDU> tedeb…@leland.Stanford.EDU (Theodore Chen) writes:
>>In article <1992Aug24.171230.18…@ctp.com> bp…@ctp.com (Bob Pitas) writes:
>>>In article <1992Aug17.164537.25…@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> j…@po.CWRU.Edu (John R. Daker) writes:
>>>>I wonder about this more often now that I have 0-60 times in the 3
>>>>second range.
>>>Commuting in a top-fuel dragster? What the hell car gets ’3 second range’
>>>0-60 times? Even if you drive around with slicks, I find it hard to believe
>>>that you can get under 4 seconds… (I don’t think most motorcycles can
>>>hole-shot that fast!)
> Dude my 600 CBR does 0-60 in 3 seconds… what planet do you live on???
8^) Yeah. And my (slightly trick) GSX could easily break 3 seconds.
I wanna CBR1000… Hmm.. If the 600 does it in 3… Argh… >8^)
–
j…@access.digex.com | (Cage) 1991 323se ZCP-710 | Comus Road
Merry Land (MD) U.S.A. | (Bike) 1986 GSXR750 (sold) | ClarksBURG
——————————————————————————
But of course, I have three eyes. I have clairvoyant paranoia. -King Missile
Just as a matter of curiousity — I think that the best acceleration
a wheeled vehicle can get is 1g (and that’s assuming tires with a
coefficient of friction of 1). So, min time to get from 0-60 is 2.7 sec.
Are there any wheeled vehicles out there that claim a time lower than
that?
Mayan
P.S. The physics:
Maximum force exertable by wheels
F = u * m * g
Where:
u is coefficient of friction (<= 1)
m is mass of car
g is gravitational acceleration
Max acceleration of car
a = F/m
= u * g
= g (assuming u = 1)
t = v / a
= v / g
= 27 / 10 ( assuming 60 miles/hr = 27 m/sec, g = 10 m/sec^2)
= 2.7
Actually, 60 miles/hr = 26.8 m/s g = 9.8 m/s^2 ==> t = 2.73 sec
Whoops….if you’ve seen my article claiming less than 2.7 is improbable,
well I forgot to take one thing into account….
Aerodynamics.
You can build cars so that they behave like plane wing, only in reverse.
So the downward force could be a heck of a lot more than 1g.
Mayan