<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 55: And Then There Were (Please Help)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.autosdrive.com/55-and-then-there-were-please-help/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.autosdrive.com/55-and-then-there-were-please-help</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:15:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.autosdrive.com/55-and-then-there-were-please-help/comment-page-1#comment-4982</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.autosdrive.com/55-and-then-there-were-please-help#comment-4982</guid>
		<description>
  In article &lt;1992Sep25.195757.18...@cabot.balltown.cma.COM&gt;, &lt;br&gt; we...@cabot.balltown.cma.COM (richard welty) writes: &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&#124;&gt; alaska has no highways which could qualify for 65. &#160;i&#039;m not sure &lt;br&gt; &#124;&gt; that hawaii has any significant mileage that would qualify. &#160;rhode &lt;br&gt; &#124;&gt; island sure doesn&#039;t have much mileage of that type. &lt;br&gt; &#124;&gt; &lt;br&gt; &#124;&gt; NY, CT, MA, NJ, and PA are all 55 states, although i think that &lt;br&gt; &#124;&gt; PA is on the verge of going over to 65, although the governer &lt;br&gt; &#124;&gt; continues to threaten a veto. &lt;br&gt; &#124;&gt; &lt;br&gt; &#124;&gt; richard &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;MA raised the speed limit to 65 on the Mass Pike (I90) west of Auburn (dropping &lt;br&gt; to 55 in and around Springfield). Every other major Interstate still has a &lt;br&gt; 55 mph limit, even in the rural areas that would qualify for 65. &lt;br&gt; (mumble mumble *^*&amp;^*^ hypocrites mumble mumble) &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Luckily, MA troopers won&#039;t usually touch you for 70 or under anywhere &lt;br&gt; unless you are the only one on the road, it&#039;s the end of the month or s/he&#039;s &lt;br&gt; having a really bad day..... &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;-Jeff &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;-- &lt;br&gt; ========================= &lt;br&gt; Jeff Donsbach, Computervision Corp, 14 Crosby Dr. MS 5-2, Bedford, MA 01730 &lt;br&gt; UUCP: {decvax&#124;linus&#124;sun}!cvbnet!jdonsbac &#124; Internet: jdons...@cvbnet.prime.com &lt;br&gt; &quot;10 bucks is 10 bucks&quot; - Geddy Lee &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; (soon to be CV.Com ??) &lt;br&gt;
  
  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In article &lt;1992Sep25.195757.18&#8230;@cabot.balltown.cma.COM&gt;, <br /> <a href="mailto:we...@cabot.balltown.cma.COM">we&#8230;@cabot.balltown.cma.COM</a> (richard welty) writes: </p>
<p>|&gt; alaska has no highways which could qualify for 65. &nbsp;i&#8217;m not sure <br /> |&gt; that hawaii has any significant mileage that would qualify. &nbsp;rhode <br /> |&gt; island sure doesn&#8217;t have much mileage of that type. <br /> |&gt; <br /> |&gt; NY, CT, MA, NJ, and PA are all 55 states, although i think that <br /> |&gt; PA is on the verge of going over to 65, although the governer <br /> |&gt; continues to threaten a veto. <br /> |&gt; <br /> |&gt; richard <br /> 
<p>MA raised the speed limit to 65 on the Mass Pike (I90) west of Auburn (dropping <br /> to 55 in and around Springfield). Every other major Interstate still has a <br /> 55 mph limit, even in the rural areas that would qualify for 65. <br /> (mumble mumble *^*&amp;^*^ hypocrites mumble mumble)  </p>
<p>Luckily, MA troopers won&#8217;t usually touch you for 70 or under anywhere <br /> unless you are the only one on the road, it&#8217;s the end of the month or s/he&#8217;s <br /> having a really bad day&#8230;..  </p>
<p>-Jeff  </p>
<p>&#8211; <br /> ========================= <br /> Jeff Donsbach, Computervision Corp, 14 Crosby Dr. MS 5-2, Bedford, MA 01730 <br /> UUCP: {decvax|linus|sun}!cvbnet!jdonsbac | Internet: <a href="mailto:jdons...@cvbnet.prime.com">jdons&#8230;@cvbnet.prime.com</a> <br /> &quot;10 bucks is 10 bucks&quot; &#8211; Geddy Lee &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (soon to be CV.Com ??) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.autosdrive.com/55-and-then-there-were-please-help/comment-page-1#comment-4981</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.autosdrive.com/55-and-then-there-were-please-help#comment-4981</guid>
		<description>
  &lt;p&gt;In article &lt;1992Sep27.193106.27...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu&gt;, Brian.E.Han...@dartmouth.edu (Brian E. Hannon) writes... &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&gt;In article &lt;1992Sep24.191804.3...@photon.com&gt; &lt;br&gt; &gt;j...@photon.photon.com (Joe Naiman) writes: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&gt;&gt; I thought that nine states still had 55: &#160;Alaska and Delaware (with &lt;br&gt; &gt;&gt; no eligible roads), Hawaii, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, &lt;br&gt; &gt;&gt; Connecticut, Maryland, and New Jersey. &#160;Should I eliminate one of &lt;br&gt; &gt;&gt; those states from the list? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&gt;Hawaii and Alaska don&#039;t count since they don&#039;t have any eligible &lt;br&gt; &gt;interstates. &#160;But you forgot Massachusetts. &#160;Funny how they&#039;re all in &lt;br&gt; &gt;the northeast, huh? &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Some western stretches of the Mass Pike (rte 90) are &lt;br&gt; signed for 65 mph. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&gt;Bri &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;------------------------ &lt;br&gt; Robert K. Abbott &lt;br&gt; abb...@tps.enet.dec.com &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &lt;br&gt;
  
  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In article &lt;1992Sep27.193106.27&#8230;@dartvax.dartmouth.edu&gt;, <a href="mailto:Brian.E.Han...@dartmouth.edu">Brian.E.Han&#8230;@dartmouth.edu</a> (Brian E. Hannon) writes&#8230;  </p>
<p>&gt;In article &lt;1992Sep24.191804.3&#8230;@photon.com&gt; <br /> &gt;j&#8230;@photon.photon.com (Joe Naiman) writes:  </p>
<p>&gt;&gt; I thought that nine states still had 55: &nbsp;Alaska and Delaware (with <br /> &gt;&gt; no eligible roads), Hawaii, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, <br /> &gt;&gt; Connecticut, Maryland, and New Jersey. &nbsp;Should I eliminate one of <br /> &gt;&gt; those states from the list?  </p>
<p>&gt;Hawaii and Alaska don&#8217;t count since they don&#8217;t have any eligible <br /> &gt;interstates. &nbsp;But you forgot Massachusetts. &nbsp;Funny how they&#8217;re all in <br /> &gt;the northeast, huh? </p>
<p>Some western stretches of the Mass Pike (rte 90) are <br /> signed for 65 mph.  </p>
<p>&gt;Bri </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212; <br /> Robert K. Abbott <br /> <a href="mailto:abb...@tps.enet.dec.com">abb&#8230;@tps.enet.dec.com</a> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.autosdrive.com/55-and-then-there-were-please-help/comment-page-1#comment-4980</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.autosdrive.com/55-and-then-there-were-please-help#comment-4980</guid>
		<description>
  In article &lt;BvAzFw....@cs.columbia.edu&gt; a...@cs.columbia.edu (andrew m. boardman) writes: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&gt;The max limit in Alaska is 60, not 55. &#160;Or has this changed? &#160;(Again...) &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;What roads in Alaska have posted speed limits of 60 mph? &#160;My &lt;br&gt; understanding of the federal 65 mph legislation of a few years back &lt;br&gt; is that states which want to keep receiving federal highway funds may &lt;br&gt; set speed limits no higher than 55 mph, with only two exceptions, where &lt;br&gt; the limit may go up as high as 65 mph: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;1) &#160;Rural interstate highways (where &quot;rural&quot; is defined by some bogus &lt;br&gt; &#160; &#160; population-density criterion). &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;2) &#160;(If and only if the state has applied to be one of thirty-odd &lt;br&gt; &#160; &#160; states that can get this exemption:) &#160;Non-interstate rural &lt;br&gt; &#160; &#160; highways that are built to the same standards as interstates. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I know that Alaska doesn&#039;t have any real interstate highways, and &lt;br&gt; I can&#039;t imagine that it has many limited-access multilane divided &lt;br&gt; highways (i.e., interstate-quality roads) except perhaps in the &lt;br&gt; immediate &quot;Los Anchorage&quot; area. &#160;So where are these 60 mph-limit &lt;br&gt; roads, and what type of highways are they? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;---------------------------------------------------------------------- &lt;br&gt; Bob Goudreau &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;Data General Corporation &lt;br&gt; goudr...@dg-rtp.dg.com &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;62 Alexander Drive &#160; &#160; &#160; &lt;br&gt; +1 919 248 6231 &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; Research Triangle Park, NC &#160;27709, USA &lt;br&gt;
  
  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In article &lt;BvAzFw&#8230;.@cs.columbia.edu&gt; <a href="mailto:a...@cs.columbia.edu">a&#8230;@cs.columbia.edu</a> (andrew m. boardman) writes: <br /> 
</p>
<p>&gt;The max limit in Alaska is 60, not 55. &nbsp;Or has this changed? &nbsp;(Again&#8230;) </p>
<p>What roads in Alaska have posted speed limits of 60 mph? &nbsp;My <br /> understanding of the federal 65 mph legislation of a few years back <br /> is that states which want to keep receiving federal highway funds may <br /> set speed limits no higher than 55 mph, with only two exceptions, where <br /> the limit may go up as high as 65 mph:  </p>
<p>1) &nbsp;Rural interstate highways (where &quot;rural&quot; is defined by some bogus <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; population-density criterion).  </p>
<p>2) &nbsp;(If and only if the state has applied to be one of thirty-odd <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; states that can get this exemption:) &nbsp;Non-interstate rural <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; highways that are built to the same standards as interstates.  </p>
<p>I know that Alaska doesn&#8217;t have any real interstate highways, and <br /> I can&#8217;t imagine that it has many limited-access multilane divided <br /> highways (i.e., interstate-quality roads) except perhaps in the <br /> immediate &quot;Los Anchorage&quot; area. &nbsp;So where are these 60 mph-limit <br /> roads, and what type of highways are they?  </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- <br /> Bob Goudreau &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Data General Corporation <br /> <a href="mailto:goudr...@dg-rtp.dg.com">goudr&#8230;@dg-rtp.dg.com</a> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;62 Alexander Drive &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <br /> +1 919 248 6231 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Research Triangle Park, NC &nbsp;27709, USA </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.autosdrive.com/55-and-then-there-were-please-help/comment-page-1#comment-4979</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.autosdrive.com/55-and-then-there-were-please-help#comment-4979</guid>
		<description>
  In article &lt;1992Sep25.195757.18...@cabot.balltown.cma.COM&gt; we...@cabot.balltown.cma.COM (richard welty) writes: &lt;br&gt; &gt;In article &lt;1992Sep24.191804.3...@photon.com&gt; j...@photon.photon.com (Joe Naiman) writes: &lt;br&gt; &gt;&gt;The article said that New Jersey was one of EIGHT states which still &lt;br&gt; &gt;&gt;had a 55 mph speed limit. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&gt;&gt;I thought that nine states still had 55: &#160;Alaska and Delaware (with &lt;br&gt; &gt;&gt;no eligible roads), Hawaii, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, &lt;br&gt; &gt;&gt;Connecticut, Maryland, and New Jersey. &#160;Should I eliminate one of &lt;br&gt; &gt;&gt;those states from the list? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&gt;alaska has no highways which could qualify for 65. &#160;i&#039;m not sure &lt;br&gt; &gt;that hawaii has any significant mileage that would qualify. &#160;rhode &lt;br&gt; &gt;island sure doesn&#039;t have much mileage of that type. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Hawaii has about 15 miles or so (all of I-H2, ewa end of I-H1) of road &lt;br&gt; that would qualify, but the Waihee and Fasi administrations gain too &lt;br&gt; much revenue from having HPD run radar traps on those segments, so they &lt;br&gt; stay 55...for more details, see the NMA &quot;Driver&#039;s Handbook&quot; listing &lt;br&gt; for Hawaii... &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;On a somewhat related note, there was a front page story in the Dayton &lt;br&gt; Daily News this week about the DPD&#039;s new $3500 lidar guns, so draw &lt;br&gt; your own conclusions... &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;-- &lt;br&gt; Jeff Miller, &#160;NH6ZW/N8, &#160;AFA1HE (ex WD6CQV, AFA8JM, AFA1DO) &lt;br&gt; AFIT School of Engineering, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH &lt;br&gt; &quot;You gotta expect some losses when you fly the heavies, man&quot; -- Jeff Conn &lt;br&gt; &quot;No brain, no pain&quot; -- filched from some new movie promo &lt;br&gt;
  
  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In article &lt;1992Sep25.195757.18&#8230;@cabot.balltown.cma.COM&gt; <a href="mailto:we...@cabot.balltown.cma.COM">we&#8230;@cabot.balltown.cma.COM</a> (richard welty) writes: <br /> &gt;In article &lt;1992Sep24.191804.3&#8230;@photon.com&gt; <a href="mailto:j...@photon.photon.com">j&#8230;@photon.photon.com</a> (Joe Naiman) writes: <br /> &gt;&gt;The article said that New Jersey was one of EIGHT states which still <br /> &gt;&gt;had a 55 mph speed limit. <br /> 
<p>&gt;&gt;I thought that nine states still had 55: &nbsp;Alaska and Delaware (with <br /> &gt;&gt;no eligible roads), Hawaii, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, <br /> &gt;&gt;Connecticut, Maryland, and New Jersey. &nbsp;Should I eliminate one of <br /> &gt;&gt;those states from the list?  </p>
<p>&gt;alaska has no highways which could qualify for 65. &nbsp;i&#8217;m not sure <br /> &gt;that hawaii has any significant mileage that would qualify. &nbsp;rhode <br /> &gt;island sure doesn&#8217;t have much mileage of that type. </p>
<p>Hawaii has about 15 miles or so (all of I-H2, ewa end of I-H1) of road <br /> that would qualify, but the Waihee and Fasi administrations gain too <br /> much revenue from having HPD run radar traps on those segments, so they <br /> stay 55&#8230;for more details, see the NMA &quot;Driver&#8217;s Handbook&quot; listing <br /> for Hawaii&#8230;  </p>
<p>On a somewhat related note, there was a front page story in the Dayton <br /> Daily News this week about the DPD&#8217;s new $3500 lidar guns, so draw <br /> your own conclusions&#8230;  </p>
<p>&#8211; <br /> Jeff Miller, &nbsp;NH6ZW/N8, &nbsp;AFA1HE (ex WD6CQV, AFA8JM, AFA1DO) <br /> AFIT School of Engineering, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH <br /> &quot;You gotta expect some losses when you fly the heavies, man&quot; &#8212; Jeff Conn <br /> &quot;No brain, no pain&quot; &#8212; filched from some new movie promo </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.autosdrive.com/55-and-then-there-were-please-help/comment-page-1#comment-4978</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.autosdrive.com/55-and-then-there-were-please-help#comment-4978</guid>
		<description>
  &lt;p&gt;In article &lt;1a5do1INN...@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu&gt; ah...@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Richard Banks) writes: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&gt;When you do know it is safe to speed without getting caught by highway &lt;br&gt; &gt;patrol? &#160;A friend told me when you see all the semi tractor-trialer &lt;br&gt; &gt;truckers speeding that you can assume you are in a safe zone to speed &lt;br&gt; &gt;until you notice they slow down to 55 again. &#160; &lt;br&gt; &gt;Any thoughts? &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;You can never KNOW it is safe. &#160;If the opportunity presents itself, I &lt;br&gt; get behind and to the right of a speeding semi-- since the radar cops &lt;br&gt; tend to be in the median, they can&#039;t read a car in that position. &#160;But &lt;br&gt; you still have to watch out for cops on the right side, or cops &lt;br&gt; behind, pacing you. &lt;br&gt; -- &lt;br&gt; Matthew T. Russotto &#160; &#160; russo...@eng.umd.edu &#160; &#160; &#160;russo...@wam.umd.edu &lt;br&gt; Some news readers expect &quot;Disclaimer:&quot; here. &lt;br&gt; Just say NO to police searches and seizures. &#160;Make them use force. &lt;br&gt; (not responsible for bodily harm resulting from following above advice) &lt;br&gt;
  
  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In article &lt;1a5do1INN&#8230;@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu&gt; <a href="mailto:ah...@cleveland.Freenet.Edu">ah&#8230;@cleveland.Freenet.Edu</a> (Richard Banks) writes:  </p>
<p>&gt;When you do know it is safe to speed without getting caught by highway <br /> &gt;patrol? &nbsp;A friend told me when you see all the semi tractor-trialer <br /> &gt;truckers speeding that you can assume you are in a safe zone to speed <br /> &gt;until you notice they slow down to 55 again. &nbsp; <br /> &gt;Any thoughts? </p>
<p>You can never KNOW it is safe. &nbsp;If the opportunity presents itself, I <br /> get behind and to the right of a speeding semi&#8211; since the radar cops <br /> tend to be in the median, they can&#8217;t read a car in that position. &nbsp;But <br /> you still have to watch out for cops on the right side, or cops <br /> behind, pacing you. <br /> &#8212; <br /> Matthew T. Russotto &nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="mailto:russo...@eng.umd.edu">russo&#8230;@eng.umd.edu</a> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;russo&#8230;@wam.umd.edu <br /> Some news readers expect &quot;Disclaimer:&quot; here. <br /> Just say NO to police searches and seizures. &nbsp;Make them use force. <br /> (not responsible for bodily harm resulting from following above advice) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.autosdrive.com/55-and-then-there-were-please-help/comment-page-1#comment-4977</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.autosdrive.com/55-and-then-there-were-please-help#comment-4977</guid>
		<description>
  Brian.E.Han...@dartmouth.edu (Brian E. Hannon) writes: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&gt;j...@photon.photon.com (Joe Naiman) writes: &lt;br&gt; &gt;&gt; I thought that nine states still had 55: &#160;Alaska and Delaware (with &lt;br&gt; &gt;&gt; no eligible roads) &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;The max limit in Alaska is 60, not 55. &#160;Or has this changed? &#160;(Again...) &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&gt;Hawaii and Alaska don&#039;t count since they don&#039;t have any eligible &lt;br&gt; &gt;interstates. &#160;But you forgot Massachusetts. &#160;Funny how they&#039;re all in &lt;br&gt; &gt;the northeast, huh? &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Two pieces of the Mass Pike are up to 65. &#160;(And none of this half-assed &lt;br&gt; &quot;65 only for vehicles of type N&quot;.) &#160;It&#039;s a start... &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;andrew &lt;br&gt;
  
  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="mailto:Brian.E.Han...@dartmouth.edu">Brian.E.Han&#8230;@dartmouth.edu</a> (Brian E. Hannon) writes: <br /> 
<p>&gt;j&#8230;@photon.photon.com (Joe Naiman) writes: <br /> &gt;&gt; I thought that nine states still had 55: &nbsp;Alaska and Delaware (with <br /> &gt;&gt; no eligible roads) </p>
<p>The max limit in Alaska is 60, not 55. &nbsp;Or has this changed? &nbsp;(Again&#8230;)  </p>
<p>&gt;Hawaii and Alaska don&#8217;t count since they don&#8217;t have any eligible <br /> &gt;interstates. &nbsp;But you forgot Massachusetts. &nbsp;Funny how they&#8217;re all in <br /> &gt;the northeast, huh? </p>
<p>Two pieces of the Mass Pike are up to 65. &nbsp;(And none of this half-assed <br /> &quot;65 only for vehicles of type N&quot;.) &nbsp;It&#8217;s a start&#8230;  </p>
<p>andrew </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.autosdrive.com/55-and-then-there-were-please-help/comment-page-1#comment-4976</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.autosdrive.com/55-and-then-there-were-please-help#comment-4976</guid>
		<description>
  In article &lt;1992Sep27.193106.27...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu&gt; Brian.E.Han...@dartmouth.edu (Brian E. Hannon) writes: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&gt;In article &lt;1992Sep24.191804.3...@photon.com&gt; &lt;br&gt; &gt;j...@photon.photon.com (Joe Naiman) writes: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&gt;&gt; I thought that nine states still had 55: &#160;.... &lt;br&gt; &gt;But you forgot Massachusetts. &#160;Funny how they&#039;re all in &lt;br&gt; &gt;the northeast, huh? &lt;br&gt; &gt;Bri &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&#160; &#160; &#160;Western portions of the Mass Pike (starting about 30 miles out of &lt;br&gt; Boston) are now 65 through to the NY state line. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&#160; &#160; &#160;Now if we can just get some of the other places the government &lt;br&gt; prostitutes the law to raise revenue fixed up... &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; Peter Trei &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Disclaimer: I don&#039;t thnk my employer has an opinion on speed limits... &lt;br&gt;
  
  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In article &lt;1992Sep27.193106.27&#8230;@dartvax.dartmouth.edu&gt; <a href="mailto:Brian.E.Han...@dartmouth.edu">Brian.E.Han&#8230;@dartmouth.edu</a> (Brian E. Hannon) writes: <br /> 
<p>&gt;In article &lt;1992Sep24.191804.3&#8230;@photon.com&gt; <br /> &gt;j&#8230;@photon.photon.com (Joe Naiman) writes:  </p>
<p>&gt;&gt; I thought that nine states still had 55: &nbsp;&#8230;. <br /> &gt;But you forgot Massachusetts. &nbsp;Funny how they&#8217;re all in <br /> &gt;the northeast, huh? <br /> &gt;Bri </p>
<p>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Western portions of the Mass Pike (starting about 30 miles out of <br /> Boston) are now 65 through to the NY state line.  </p>
<p>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Now if we can just get some of the other places the government <br /> prostitutes the law to raise revenue fixed up&#8230;  </p>
<p>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Peter Trei  </p>
<p>Disclaimer: I don&#8217;t thnk my employer has an opinion on speed limits&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.autosdrive.com/55-and-then-there-were-please-help/comment-page-1#comment-4975</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.autosdrive.com/55-and-then-there-were-please-help#comment-4975</guid>
		<description>
  In article &lt;1992Sep27.193106.27...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu&gt; Brian.E.Han...@dartmouth.edu (Brian E. Hannon) writes: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&gt;In article &lt;1992Sep24.191804.3...@photon.com&gt; &lt;br&gt; &gt;j...@photon.photon.com (Joe Naiman) writes: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&gt;&gt; I thought that nine states still had 55: &#160;Alaska and Delaware (with &lt;br&gt; &gt;&gt; no eligible roads), Hawaii, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, &lt;br&gt; &gt;&gt; Connecticut, Maryland, and New Jersey. &#160;Should I eliminate one of &lt;br&gt; &gt;&gt; those states from the list? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&gt;Hawaii and Alaska don&#039;t count since they don&#039;t have any eligible &lt;br&gt; &gt;interstates. &#160;But you forgot Massachusetts. &#160;Funny how they&#039;re all in &lt;br&gt; &gt;the northeast, huh? &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Nope, as I understand it, there are now sections of the Mass Turnpike &lt;br&gt; that is 65 mph. &#160;That happened earlier this year (1992). &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Standard Disclaimer- Any opinions, etc. are mine and NOT my employer&#039;s. &lt;br&gt; ------------------------------------------------------------------------- &lt;br&gt; Note - If email replying to me with an automatic addressing process &lt;br&gt; bounces, manually address the resend using one of the addresses below. &lt;br&gt; ------------------------------------------------------------------------- &lt;br&gt; Bill Sohl (K2UNK) BELLCORE (Bell Communications Research, Inc.) &lt;br&gt; Morristown, NJ &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; email via UUCP &#160; &#160; &#160;bcr!dancer!whs70 &lt;br&gt; 201-829-2879 Weekdays &#160; &#160; &#160;email via Internet &#160;wh...@dancer.cc.bellcore.com &lt;br&gt;
  
  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In article &lt;1992Sep27.193106.27&#8230;@dartvax.dartmouth.edu&gt; <a href="mailto:Brian.E.Han...@dartmouth.edu">Brian.E.Han&#8230;@dartmouth.edu</a> (Brian E. Hannon) writes: <br /> 
<p>&gt;In article &lt;1992Sep24.191804.3&#8230;@photon.com&gt; <br /> &gt;j&#8230;@photon.photon.com (Joe Naiman) writes:  </p>
<p>&gt;&gt; I thought that nine states still had 55: &nbsp;Alaska and Delaware (with <br /> &gt;&gt; no eligible roads), Hawaii, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, <br /> &gt;&gt; Connecticut, Maryland, and New Jersey. &nbsp;Should I eliminate one of <br /> &gt;&gt; those states from the list?  </p>
<p>&gt;Hawaii and Alaska don&#8217;t count since they don&#8217;t have any eligible <br /> &gt;interstates. &nbsp;But you forgot Massachusetts. &nbsp;Funny how they&#8217;re all in <br /> &gt;the northeast, huh? </p>
<p>Nope, as I understand it, there are now sections of the Mass Turnpike <br /> that is 65 mph. &nbsp;That happened earlier this year (1992).  </p>
<p>Standard Disclaimer- Any opinions, etc. are mine and NOT my employer&#8217;s. <br /> &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- <br /> Note &#8211; If email replying to me with an automatic addressing process <br /> bounces, manually address the resend using one of the addresses below. <br /> &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- <br /> Bill Sohl (K2UNK) BELLCORE (Bell Communications Research, Inc.) <br /> Morristown, NJ &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; email via UUCP &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;bcr!dancer!whs70 <br /> 201-829-2879 Weekdays &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;email via Internet &nbsp;wh&#8230;@dancer.cc.bellcore.com </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.autosdrive.com/55-and-then-there-were-please-help/comment-page-1#comment-4974</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.autosdrive.com/55-and-then-there-were-please-help#comment-4974</guid>
		<description>
  &lt;p&gt;In article &lt;1a5do1INN...@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu&gt; ah...@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Richard Banks) writes: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&gt;When you do know it is safe to speed without getting caught by highway &lt;br&gt; &gt;patrol? &#160;A friend told me when you see all the semi tractor-trialer &lt;br&gt; &gt;truckers speeding that you can assume you are in a safe zone to speed &lt;br&gt; &gt;until you notice they slow down to 55 again. &#160; &lt;br&gt; &gt;Any thoughts? &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;This concept can be generalized to include all fast moving vehicles. &lt;br&gt; Just the other weekend my butt was saved by some old geezer in a white &lt;br&gt; Nissan Sentra who was bound and determined to prove that his car was &lt;br&gt; better than mine. After allowing him to pass me, I sped up and followed &lt;br&gt; him (he was going around 80 MPH) at a safe distance. Sure enough, as he &lt;br&gt; topped a small rise, his brake lights came on full. I slowed down just &lt;br&gt; in time to see a trooper parked at the bottom of the hill. Although he &lt;br&gt; was alert and spotted the cop in time to slow down himself, even if he &lt;br&gt; didn&#039;t the cop would have nailed him first leaving me free and clear. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;This could be called the Roger Ramjet Radar Shield. ;-) &lt;br&gt;
  
  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In article &lt;1a5do1INN&#8230;@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu&gt; <a href="mailto:ah...@cleveland.Freenet.Edu">ah&#8230;@cleveland.Freenet.Edu</a> (Richard Banks) writes:  </p>
<p>&gt;When you do know it is safe to speed without getting caught by highway <br /> &gt;patrol? &nbsp;A friend told me when you see all the semi tractor-trialer <br /> &gt;truckers speeding that you can assume you are in a safe zone to speed <br /> &gt;until you notice they slow down to 55 again. &nbsp; <br /> &gt;Any thoughts? </p>
<p>This concept can be generalized to include all fast moving vehicles. <br /> Just the other weekend my butt was saved by some old geezer in a white <br /> Nissan Sentra who was bound and determined to prove that his car was <br /> better than mine. After allowing him to pass me, I sped up and followed <br /> him (he was going around 80 MPH) at a safe distance. Sure enough, as he <br /> topped a small rise, his brake lights came on full. I slowed down just <br /> in time to see a trooper parked at the bottom of the hill. Although he <br /> was alert and spotted the cop in time to slow down himself, even if he <br /> didn&#8217;t the cop would have nailed him first leaving me free and clear.  </p>
<p>This could be called the Roger Ramjet Radar Shield. <img src='http://www.autosdrive.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.autosdrive.com/55-and-then-there-were-please-help/comment-page-1#comment-4973</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.autosdrive.com/55-and-then-there-were-please-help#comment-4973</guid>
		<description>
  &lt;p&gt;In article &lt;1992Sep27.204311.7...@cs.yale.edu&gt; fields-d...@CS.YALE.EDU (Doug Fields) writes: &lt;br&gt; &gt;Pennsylvania has those beautiful green and yellow signs that let you know &lt;br&gt; &gt;that &quot;Pennsylvania state speed limit STILL 55 MPH!!!&quot; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&gt;Damn communist state. Just like CT. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Maryland has those silly signs, too. &#160;I chuckle as I whiz by at a &lt;br&gt; &quot;slightly modified&quot; speed. &#160;8^) &lt;br&gt; -- &lt;br&gt; j...@access.digex.com &#160;&#124; (Cage) 1991 323se &#160; &#160; ZCP-710 &#160; &#124; &#160; &#160; Comus Road &lt;br&gt; Merry Land (MD) U.S.A. &#124; (Bike) 1986 GSXR750 &#160; &#160;(sold) &#160; &#124; &#160; &#160; ClarksBURG &lt;br&gt; ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ &lt;br&gt; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; NeXTstep 3.0: &#160;Have you hugged *your* object today? &lt;br&gt;
  
  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In article &lt;1992Sep27.204311.7&#8230;@cs.yale.edu&gt; <a href="mailto:fields-d...@CS.YALE.EDU">fields-d&#8230;@CS.YALE.EDU</a> (Doug Fields) writes: <br /> &gt;Pennsylvania has those beautiful green and yellow signs that let you know <br /> &gt;that &quot;Pennsylvania state speed limit STILL 55 MPH!!!&quot;  </p>
<p>&gt;Damn communist state. Just like CT. </p>
<p>Maryland has those silly signs, too. &nbsp;I chuckle as I whiz by at a <br /> &quot;slightly modified&quot; speed. &nbsp;8^) <br /> &#8212; <br /> <a href="mailto:j...@access.digex.com">j&#8230;@access.digex.com</a> &nbsp;| (Cage) 1991 323se &nbsp; &nbsp; ZCP-710 &nbsp; | &nbsp; &nbsp; Comus Road <br /> Merry Land (MD) U.S.A. | (Bike) 1986 GSXR750 &nbsp; &nbsp;(sold) &nbsp; | &nbsp; &nbsp; ClarksBURG <br /> &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212; <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; NeXTstep 3.0: &nbsp;Have you hugged *your* object today? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

